On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:49:25PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:22:46PM +0000, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > > > > I think there might be some interesting policy/naming issues to work though for JRuby-only libraries and libraries that contain JAR files as well as shared libraries, etc. Fun times ahead. > > For example, jruby-openssl that I need to package very soon in order > to upload jruby to unstable. > > https://bugs.debian.org/787027 > > I'm still not quite sure about of how to name its binary package. I guess jruby-$foo would be a good naming convention for jruby-specific packages? -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature