Re: RFS: ruby-fastimage
Hi,
At Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:11:02 +0200,
Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org> wrote:
> > But lintian said that:
> > W: ruby-fastimage source: missing-runtime-tests-field tests
> > P: ruby-fastimage source: unknown-runtime-tests-field test-command
>
> > How to handle above mentions? Is this a linitan matter?
>
> It is just because lintian is lagging a bit in comparision
> with the debian/tests/control syntax.
Ok. I'll ignore these messages.
> > > - instead of using a patch to import the image from the upstream
> > > Git repository, maybe you can use a tarball created from tagged
> > > commits on Github:
> > > https://github.com/sdsykes/fastimage/releases
> > > That would avoid the trouble of carrying around binary diffs.
>
> > Hmm...
>
> > Unfortunately, upstream forgot create release tag in github repo.
> > Github release tag: v1.6.0
> > RubyGem release: v1.6.3
>
> > I already sent request to upstream about missing fixtures. But, if we
> > have to avoid to use binary diff, I'll create package using github
> > sources with version number, e.g., 1.6.3~gitYYYYMMDD-1.
>
> That would probably be the way to go, then. In the mean time, can you
> open an issue upstream to tag 1.6.3 on the Git repo? Maybe it will be
> solved more quickly than the inclusion of the picture in the gem.
It's resonable. I'll do that.
Best wishes,
Youhei
---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
<uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
Reply to: