Re: Regarding gitlab
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 20:33:09 +0100, Daniel Martí wrote:
>
>> We use patched libraries because we need some fixes and improvements over
>> native one.
>
> I asked whether he tried merging those changes into their respective
> upstream repositories.
>
>> I can build a gems like `gitlab-grit` or something if it saves you a lot of
>> efforts.
>
> Would this be a valid workaround? AFAIK the gems would not conflict with
> the original ones. It wouldn't be the cleanest of the solutions, but it
> might just work (if the "merge the changes into the gems" option is not
> possible).
What are the changes that are incompatible with original upstream?
I suppose I would rather patch gitlab to use vanilla grit, if possible.
--
Per
Reply to: