Praveen A escreveu isso aí: > 2011/9/5 Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>: > > debian/rules > > ------------ > > > > Is there a good reason to disable the 'require-rubygems' test? > > It was my mistake :( I should have patched out those files with > require 'rubygems'. Corrected now with a patch and added those tests > again. Usually we also want to remove insane manipulations of the $LOAD_PATH, such as: $:.unshift "../../ruby_parser/dev/lib" $:.unshift "../../ruby2ruby/dev/lib" ($: == $LOAD_PATH) I updated your patch, check 1db9635. Please ping me again when ruby-sexp-processor hits the archive. It was already accepted, so this should be really soon now. -------------------------------------------------------------------- re ruby-cutest: debian/patches/remove-hard-coded-lib-path.patch: `require 'cutest'` should Just Work, since lib/cutest.rb will end up in the $LOAD_PATH. debian/control: short description must not begin with package name debian/ruby-tests.rb is all commented out, but there are tests in the package to be run during the build. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature