Re: Debian Ruby packaging changes
Am Montag, den 20.06.2011 um 7:48 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 16/06/11 at 09:11 +0200, Thomas Müller wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011 um 1:55 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
> > > Thomas Müller escreveu isso aí:
> > > > here we go - please find ruby-soap4r on mentors:
> > > > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=ruby-soap4r
> > > >
> > > > Please have a closed look and send back all your comments.
> > >
> > > After I login to mentors.debian.net, it says:
> > >
> > > Are you the owner?
> > > It appears like this package is not owned by you.
> > >
> > > It seems like you have to "publish" your package or something (I'm not
> > > familiar with the mentors.debian.net workflow). Alternatively you can
> > > upload the source package somewhere and send a link to the .dsc file.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for the wrong link - please use that one:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=ruby-soap4r
> >
> > > > Known issues:
> > > > - (gem) version 1.0.0: I already got the feedback form the gem author - he will change the version to 2.0.0
> > > > - missing man pages: I'll write them in the next days
> > > > - breaking tests: tests are written using the gem test-unit - already packaged for ruby1.9? - need to dig into this
> > >
> > > test/unit is part of ruby1.8, and ruby1.9 has a compatible
> > > (but different) implementation, the unit tests should work regardless.
> > >
> >
> > Tests require 'test/unit/testsuite' - what I miss on my sid-chroot.
> > Any idea which package is missing?
> >
> > > > Maybe there is a sponsor available as well?
> > > > Is the Debian Ruby Team willing to take the maintainership?
> > >
> > > Are you willing to maintain it inside the Ruby team? ;-)
> > >
> >
> > What ritual is necessary to join? ;-)
>
> Hi,
>
> see http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby (it might not be perfectly
> documented, but if you don't figure out, ask questions, and then improve
> the doc ;)
>
I'm already digging into this ;-)
>
> Quick review of your package:
>
> - is there a reason not to package https://rubygems.org/gems/soap4r ?
> Ok, it might not work with 1.9, but maybe you could backport the changes
> from soap4r-ruby1.9 ?
>
(Fransesco already replied on this - myself as well on the new thread)
> I'm a bit worried that soap4r-ruby1.9 will not be maintained.
>
> Also, we really want to support both 1.8 and 1.9, not just 1.9.
>
> $ grep FIXME *
> ruby-soap.docs:# FIXME: READMEs found
> ruby-soap.examples:# FIXME: sample/ dir found in source. Consider
> installing the examples.
>
Should the examples go into a separate package?
> You need transitional packages. see
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy and gen-ruby-trans-pkgs
>
... still digging ...
> > > > - breaking tests: tests are written using the gem test-unit - already packaged for ruby1.9? - need to dig into this
> > >
> > > test/unit is part of ruby1.8, and ruby1.9 has a compatible
> > > (but different) implementation, the unit tests should work regardless.
> > >
> >
> > Tests require 'test/unit/testsuite' - what I miss on my sid-chroot.
> > Any idea which package is missing?
>
> Apparently ruby 1.9 has a compatible implementation of test/unit, but
> it's possible that some special stuff used in 16runnner.rb is not
> compatible. The easier solution could be to simply hack 16runner.rb so
> that it runs with 1.9. (we don't need all the complexity in this
> anyway).
>
yep
THX,
Thomas
> - Lucas
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 20110620054808.GA30183@xanadu.blop.info">http://lists.debian.org/20110620054808.GA30183@xanadu.blop.info
Reply to: