On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:15:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Comments? hm...just thought of something. some ruby packages provide stuff in /usr/bin/. thin, for example...so there's a thin1.8 and a thin1.9, and the symlink in the dependency package. this should be unaffected by the new policy, because thin is compiled. but now this package (libpacket-ruby) is pure ruby and has something in /usr/bin/. how can/ should we handle that we handle that with ruby-support? -- _________________________ Ryan Niebur ryanryan52@gmail.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature