Re: buildds: rv-osuosl-01 vs rv-mullvad-03
Hi,
On 2022-08-31 17:46, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi Manuel !
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:49 PM Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 13:49, Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Would you have an explanation for the repeated failures (FTBFS) of
> > > highway on rv-plct-04 / rv-plct-06 & rv-plct-07 ?
> > >
> > > As mentioned previously I cannot reproduce it on my side neither
> > > schroot / nor real hardware.
> >
> > I scheduled another rebuild, it ended up in rv-plct-03, trying again
> > to see if we have more luck now...
> >
> > As for the failures in rv-plct-xx machines, yeah, there have been
> > reports in the last few days in several packages, not sure what's
> > going on -- aurel32 checked and one possible cause is high
> > temperature, but no definitive conclusions yet.
> >
> > Maybe it would be good to disable them temporarily, or add some delay
> > so the more stable machines get more chances and so to avoid this
> > affecting and causing alarm and mistrust among maintianers.
>
> Ok, thanks for the update.
>
> While on the subject (no finger pointing - just curiosity). Could
> someone confirm why I am seeing old packages on riscv-64:
>
> [...]g++-12_12.1.0-8 gcc-12_12.1.0-8[...]
>
> ref:
>
> * https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=highway&arch=riscv64&ver=1.0.1-2&stamp=1661954239&raw=0
This is a combination of gcc-12 being late to be built due to a first
FTBFS on a not really stable buildd and broken mirrors due to the rsync
security update. Anyway that's not the issue here.
The illegal instruction is the following one and comes from inline
assembly code in highway:
0x0000003f861eaf0a <+92>: add a5,a5,sp
=> 0x0000003f861eaf0c <+94>: rdcycle a3
0x0000003f861eaf10 <+98>: rdcycle a4
Cheers
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: