Re: Bug#1121698: transition: graphviz
Hi,
Am 13. Dezember 2025 19:41:42 MEZ schrieb "László Böszörményi (GCS)" <gcs@debian.org>:
>On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 6:54 PM Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> wrote:
>> Am 13.12.25 um 18:04 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
>> > Your source package seems to be abandoned. Only reached version 0.0.2
>> > in 2017 and not updated since. Eight years without any change is a
>> > dead project for me. It is also unmaintained, debhelper level is 9
>> > (the recent one is 13) and used standards version is 3.9.5 (the recent
>> > one is 4.7.2).
>> > In short, please stop blaming graphviz when it is not used and doxygen
>> > clearly shows configuration problems in your source package.
>>
>> While we are at it:
>>
>> BTW, what about an ICU transition which should have been done already two times?
> We can drop snowballs on each other, but I don't see why we should
>and where do you want to arrive.
I haven't started. You claimed libzmf was rotten...
>It is still true that you didn't investigate the build failure of your
>package, I had to do it. Instead, you jumped on graphviz.
Because it looked familiar by the symptoms while I was really doing other libre office stuff.
> While it's not that public, there were two deaths in my family. I was
>busy with that
Bad to hear. I am sorry, really. (Whether you. Believe or not)
>> Also note you were not even maintaining your own packages properly, since:
>[...]
>> was not done by you as the maintainer of the ICU package (as you should have done).
> While not done by me, we exchanged emails in the background.
Ok.
>> So don't blame people for not maintaining their packages when they are and you have your own packages where you don't. Thanks.
> Indeed, I learnt a lot from you.
(....)
>Thanks for your points,
Hope you my point about wrong blaming about non-maintained packages? That was my only point.
Regards
Rebe
Reply to: