Hi, On 22-10-2023 21:57, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 21:12 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:Hi, On 22-10-2023 15:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:Adding owner to the loop: Don, any idea what caused the RC bugs export to miss all the non-pseudo package RC bugs? Would it be possible to fail the export in such a case instead of providing partial RC bug data?2023-10-10 [20:28:26] <elbrus> why, o why did this migrate to testing despite an RC bug https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcleri [20:28:39] <elbrus> I know the package and the bug.... [20:29:03] <elbrus> seems like britney got confused yesterday [20:29:55] <elbrus> same for gitaly It seems to have occurred more than once. So yes, we need a stronger guard against this.FWIW I'm not spotting any obviously wrongly-sized bugscan files around then, looking on buxtehude.
Right, all files on 2023-10-09 and 2023-10-10 mention #1020507, so *that* case wasn't caused by loss of info on the bts side. I'll check later if the bts misrepresented the bug before britney migrated the package, but it's bed time now.
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature