Re: Lots of buggy packages propagated to trixie today (?)
On 2023-10-22 13:43:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 14:37 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2023-10-22 13:20:43 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > It is just me, or lots of packages that were autoremoved
> > > from testing have propagated to testing again this night?
> > >
> > > Example: "broker" has #1037597, however:
> > >
> > > $ rmadison broker
> > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | oldstable | source
> > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | stable | source
> > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | testing | source
> > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | unstable | source
> > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | unstable-debug | source
> >
> > Don't know yet why this happened. For that run, broker was marked as
> > BLOCKED but was still tried.
>
> Depending on exactly which run, at a guess this is related to:
>
> adsb@buxtehude:~$ ls -ltr /srv/bugs.debian.org/bugscan/stati | tail -n10
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 716663 Oct 22 02:52 status-202310220250
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 9865 Oct 22 03:50 status-202310220350
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715452 Oct 22 04:50 status-202310220450
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715452 Oct 22 05:50 status-202310220550
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715452 Oct 22 06:50 status-202310220650
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715823 Oct 22 07:51 status-202310220750
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 716262 Oct 22 08:51 status-202310220850
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 718794 Oct 22 09:52 status-202310220950
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 717317 Oct 22 10:50 status-202310221050
> -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 717694 Oct 22 11:51 status-202310221150
>
> The small file from 03:50 only seems to contain bugs relating to
> pseudo-packages, based on a quick visual scan.
That would fit the time. b1/britney only checks for empty files.
Adding owner to the loop: Don, any idea what caused the RC bugs export
to miss all the non-pseudo package RC bugs? Would it be possible to fail
the export in such a case instead of providing partial RC bug data?
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: