[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf



Control: tags -1 = confirmed

On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945
> 
> On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hi RMs,
> > 
> > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the
> > ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just
> > starting[1].
> > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues,
> > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only
> > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix
> > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to
> > be done.
> > 
> > Failing packages and fixes in detail.
> > Level 2:
> > android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for
> > experimental (not Sid!).
> > libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which
> > I provided a fix [3].
> > target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update that.
> > 
> > Level 3:
> > cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus
> > transition done it compiles fine.
> > grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he
> > will be ready to update the package.
> > llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems
> > seem to be fixed with the upload just happened.
> > llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other
> > problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced
> > llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of
> > issues anyway.
> 
> Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done.

Please go ahead

Cheers

> 
> Cheers
> 
> > 
> > Thanks for considering,
> > Laszlo/GCS
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5
> > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012572
> > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1023497
> > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/1023496
> > [5] https://bugs.debian.org/1023498
> > [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1023500
> > [7] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532
> > [8] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532
> > [9] https://bugs.debian.org/1023444
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Sebastian Ramacher
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


Reply to: