Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf
Hi László
On 2022-11-21 20:42:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
>
> On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945
> >
> > On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > Hi RMs,
> > >
> > > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the
> > > ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just
> > > starting[1].
> > > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues,
> > > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only
> > > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix
> > > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to
> > > be done.
> > >
> > > Failing packages and fixes in detail.
> > > Level 2:
> > > android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for
> > > experimental (not Sid!).
> > > libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which
> > > I provided a fix [3].
> > > target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update that.
> > >
> > > Level 3:
> > > cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus
> > > transition done it compiles fine.
> > > grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he
> > > will be ready to update the package.
> > > llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems
> > > seem to be fixed with the upload just happened.
> > > llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other
> > > problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced
> > > llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of
> > > issues anyway.
> >
> > Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done.
>
> Please go ahead
protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at
them? Thanks
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: