[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf



Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945

On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi RMs,
> 
> There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the
> ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just
> starting[1].
> On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues,
> this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only
> downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix
> it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to
> be done.
> 
> Failing packages and fixes in detail.
> Level 2:
> android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for
> experimental (not Sid!).
> libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which
> I provided a fix [3].
> target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update that.
> 
> Level 3:
> cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus
> transition done it compiles fine.
> grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he
> will be ready to update the package.
> llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems
> seem to be fixed with the upload just happened.
> llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other
> problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced
> llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of
> issues anyway.

Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done.

Cheers

> 
> Thanks for considering,
> Laszlo/GCS
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012572
> [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1023497
> [4] https://bugs.debian.org/1023496
> [5] https://bugs.debian.org/1023498
> [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1023500
> [7] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532
> [8] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532
> [9] https://bugs.debian.org/1023444
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


Reply to: