On 2021-12-13 20:21:52 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2021-12-13 00:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2021-12-12 22:18, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Hi Aurelien, > > > > > > On 12-12-2021 12:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > > Thanks, I'll add the necessary hints once the glibc upload is old > > > > > enough. > > > > > > > > Those false positives are due to the fact that glibc from experimental > > > > is used, and I do not expect them to appear for glibc in sid. In > > > > addition a few of them after cruft got removed from experimental. > > > > > > > > All that said, we so many reverse dependencies, there might get more > > > > issues appearing. > > > > > > I just started to have a look, most issues I've checked so far look false > > > positives. But aribas on i386 wasn't tested for the glibc in experimental > > > (don't know why) but it fails now in unstable and tested with glibc from > > > unstable in testing with stack smashing: > > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/a/aribas/17507755/log.gz > > > > It's likely an issue on the package, but without further investigating, > > I can't confirm. I'll try to do that tomorrow. > > I have opened bug#1001653 about it. I've filed bugs for the remaining autopkgtest regressions that were not caused by glibc (flaky tests, etc.) and then added a force-skiptest hint for glibc. Unless new issues pop up, it should migrate once it reaches 5 days. Cheers > > Aurelien > > -- > Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B > aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature