Hi Aurelien, On 12-12-2021 12:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thanks, I'll add the necessary hints once the glibc upload is old enough.Those false positives are due to the fact that glibc from experimental is used, and I do not expect them to appear for glibc in sid. In addition a few of them after cruft got removed from experimental. All that said, we so many reverse dependencies, there might get more issues appearing.
I just started to have a look, most issues I've checked so far look false positives. But aribas on i386 wasn't tested for the glibc in experimental (don't know why) but it fails now in unstable and tested with glibc from unstable in testing with stack smashing:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/a/aribas/17507755/log.gzHow do we handle cross-toolchain-base? It seems to need a rebuild but I didn't investigate if that can be just a binNMU or needs a source upload.
Of to bed now. Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature