[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1001438: transition: glibc 2.33



On 2021-12-11 15:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.33.html
> 
> On 2021-12-09 23:27:41 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > Dear release team,
> > 
> > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.33. It has been
> > available in experimental for one month and a half without any reported
> > bug report. It has been built successfully on all release architectures
> > and many ports architectures.
> 
> Please go ahead.

Thanks, I have just uploaded it.

> > A few issues found through the autopkgtest pseudo excuses for
> > experimental have been fixed. The remaining are false positive, with the
> > exception of kore, but which is not testing as it FTBFS.

I submitted bug #1001558 for kore.

> Thanks, I'll add the necessary hints once the glibc upload is old
> enough.

Those false positives are due to the fact that glibc from experimental
is used, and I do not expect them to appear for glibc in sid. In
addition a few of them after cruft got removed from experimental.

All that said, we so many reverse dependencies, there might get more
issues appearing.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: