On 2021-12-12 22:18, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > On 12-12-2021 12:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Thanks, I'll add the necessary hints once the glibc upload is old > > > enough. > > > > Those false positives are due to the fact that glibc from experimental > > is used, and I do not expect them to appear for glibc in sid. In > > addition a few of them after cruft got removed from experimental. > > > > All that said, we so many reverse dependencies, there might get more > > issues appearing. > > I just started to have a look, most issues I've checked so far look false > positives. But aribas on i386 wasn't tested for the glibc in experimental > (don't know why) but it fails now in unstable and tested with glibc from > unstable in testing with stack smashing: > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/a/aribas/17507755/log.gz It's likely an issue on the package, but without further investigating, I can't confirm. I'll try to do that tomorrow. > How do we handle cross-toolchain-base? It seems to need a rebuild but I > didn't investigate if that can be just a binNMU or needs a source upload. That would do it, but unfortunately as it is arch:all, a binNMU is not possible. I'll ask for a new upload. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature