[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#956467: transition: qhull



On 29.04.20 10:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> If upstream broke the ABI
> without bumping the SONAME that's probably the correct solution, but it'd be
> good if you can convince them to bump it in the next version
I agree, and I did submit a bugreport [1], but no reply so far.

> In any case you can go ahead with this.
Thanks.


[1] https://github.com/qhull/qhull/issues/58


Reply to: