[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#954391: marked as done (transition: protobuf)

Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:48:57 +0100
with message-id <409ed484-a548-1948-43b3-ca6f5b231534@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#954391: transition: protobuf
has caused the Debian Bug report #954391,
regarding transition: protobuf
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
954391: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi RMs,

Multilevel transition needed for a while including for the grpc
package. Rebuilt reverse dependencies on amd64 and got the following
results.
Level1 is OK

Level2 is mostly OK, exceptions:
astroidmail, Sid version FTBFS but experimental version builds correctly
mixxx (sid only), unrelated and filed as #947568
ola (sid only), unrelated and filed as #925793

Level3 is mostly OK, one package FTBFS:
ignition-transport which is version 4.0.0 in Debian, was upload in
February, 2018 and popcon is low (158). The build failure was noted in
#944925 last November (five months ago) without any reaction. For the
record, upstream is at 8.0.0 version - ie maintenance of this package
is neglected for long.

Level4
gazebo FTBFS and it's sid only, popcon is low (154). Packaging is
neglected I say, Debian has version 9.12.0 while upstream is at 11.0.0
version. Its architecture field is set incorrectly, it's 'any' but
builds on i386 and amd64 only.

Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 27/03/2020 08:14, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:51 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 25/03/2020 07:06, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>>> Previously mentioned under-maintained packages ignition-msgs and
>>> ignition-transport: these build correctly but their autopkgtests are
>>> failing. What should be done with packages that have 1.0.0 vs 5.0.0
>>> and 4.0.0 vs 8.0.0 versions in the Debian archives vs upstream latest
>>> stable release. May these be removed from testing until their DM
>>> update the packages? No point on keeping these for the next Debian
>>> release as is.
>>
>> I removed those due to the failing tests to help protobuf migrate to testing, as
>> it was one of the few remaining blockers on the python3.8 transition. protobuf
>> is in testing now, but there a few rdeps that haven't migrated yet (such as
>> opencv and caffe). Once that transition finishes most of the remaining rdeps
>> will be able to migrate.
>  Thanks, grpc also migrated to testing. How can I check the binNMU
> transition of opencv and caffe? Their time delay, status and so on.

python3-defaults has just migrated, and with that the rest of protobuf's rdeps.
So this can be closed now.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: