Bug#954391: transition: protobuf
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 21/03/2020 14:08, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:20 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 21/03/2020 06:33, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>>> Multilevel transition needed for a while including for the grpc
>>> package. Rebuilt reverse dependencies on amd64 and got the following
>>> results.
>>
>> This conflicts with the ruby transition. Can't grpc be uploaded without that
>> python build-dep? Is there a reason to tie that fix to this transition?
> When that's going to be finished?
When it's finished. :-)
> But to answer your question, Pirate tried a new grpc version with the
> protobuf version in Sid, see #946194. It was looking good first, but
> was not working correctly in all cases. Do you want me to upload a
> fixed (removed that Python2 build dependency) Sid version of grpc and
> when the ruby2.7 transition is over do upload the more recent grpc
> version from experimental with the protobuf transition?
Yes, that's what I was asking for, a minimal fix for grpc with just a
s/python-sphinx-rtd-theme//, if that was possible.
However, after looking more closely into the conflict with the ruby transition,
I don't think this will delay that one (given the protobuf dep on ruby is not
versioned), and it looks quite ready (the failing rdeps are sid-only except for
ignition-transport which has no rdeps in testing, and astroidmail which can be
fixed.
So let's go ahead, and let's get things in a good shape quickly if they turn
badly so as not to delay the other transitions.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: