On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:35:29PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi tony, > > On 20-06-2019 15:44, tony mancill wrote: > > I interpret this exchange to mean that 11.0.3+7-5 is still the version > > preferred by the OpenJDK Team and so have uploaded that, built against > > buster and with distribution set the buster. > > > > Let me know if I misinterpreted and should upload with a different > > version, and thank you for the discussion and patience with this one. > > The build on arm64 failed. Can you please investigate? > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openjdk-11&arch=arm64&ver=11.0.3%2B7-5&stamp=1561082322&raw=0 Hi Paul, I emailed arm64@buildd.debian.org regarding that this morning (at 13:35 UTC), but haven't received a response yet. Perhaps related, but the first arm64 build failed for the upload to unstable last week. The build failed on arm-ubc-02 but then succeeded on arm-conova-02. I don't know if someone manually triggered the retry, but a few hours after the arm64 failure, another build was underway and successful. I mention the machine names because arm-ubc-02 and arm-ubc-03 are running the same version of sbuild, which is newer than the version of sbuild running on arm-conova-02. But perhaps there are other differences as well. If I don't hear something back by tonight, I'll try to reach the arm64 buildd admins via IRC. Thanks, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature