Bug#928185: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
On 19.06.19 22:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 18-06-2019 22:14, tony mancill wrote:
>> Things are looking good so far with 11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7 in unstable,
>> and so I would like to prepare the t-p-u upload. At the moment, the
>> version I have is 11.0.3+7-5, since that would have been the "next"
>> 11.0.3+7 Debian revision for unstable. The 11.0.3+7 orig.tar.xz already
>> in the archive is the same one used for the "really" to unstable and
>> this build, and this versioning makes it clear to users what they are
>> getting. The resulting changelog would be:
>>
>>> diff -Nru openjdk-11-11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7/debian/changelog openjdk-11-11.0.3+7/debian/changelog
>>> --- openjdk-11-11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7/debian/changelog 2019-06-14 12:28:25.000000000 -0700
>>> +++ openjdk-11-11.0.3+7/debian/changelog 2019-06-16 11:24:19.000000000 -0700
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
>>> +openjdk-11 (11.0.3+7-5) buster; urgency=medium
>>> +
>>> + * Team upload.
>>> + * Upload 11.0.4+4+realy11.0.3+7-2 to buster t-p-u.
>>> +
>>> + -- tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:24:19 -0700
>>
>> Is this acceptable to the Release Team? If not, (and I know there have
>> been some differing opinions), how shall we version the t-p-u package?
>
> I think the most logical version would be 11.0.3+7-4+deb10u1, as this is
> a targeted upload to buster.
let's use a version which also can be nicely used for the backports upload.
> I don't have a strong opinion on it. I
> still don't like it we go via tpu but I understand the ranting argument.
this will be very short-lived until the final 11.0.4 release to be uploaded into
security.
> Let's end this saga.
please do.
Reply to: