Hi Tony, On 18-06-2019 22:14, tony mancill wrote: > Things are looking good so far with 11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7 in unstable, > and so I would like to prepare the t-p-u upload. At the moment, the > version I have is 11.0.3+7-5, since that would have been the "next" > 11.0.3+7 Debian revision for unstable. The 11.0.3+7 orig.tar.xz already > in the archive is the same one used for the "really" to unstable and > this build, and this versioning makes it clear to users what they are > getting. The resulting changelog would be: > >> diff -Nru openjdk-11-11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7/debian/changelog openjdk-11-11.0.3+7/debian/changelog >> --- openjdk-11-11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7/debian/changelog 2019-06-14 12:28:25.000000000 -0700 >> +++ openjdk-11-11.0.3+7/debian/changelog 2019-06-16 11:24:19.000000000 -0700 >> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ >> +openjdk-11 (11.0.3+7-5) buster; urgency=medium >> + >> + * Team upload. >> + * Upload 11.0.4+4+realy11.0.3+7-2 to buster t-p-u. >> + >> + -- tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:24:19 -0700 > > Is this acceptable to the Release Team? If not, (and I know there have > been some differing opinions), how shall we version the t-p-u package? I think the most logical version would be 11.0.3+7-4+deb10u1, as this is a targeted upload to buster. I don't have a strong opinion on it. I still don't like it we go via tpu but I understand the ranting argument. Let's end this saga. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature