Hi, On 05-06-2019 22:28, Paul Gevers wrote: > I really want bug 900912 and 925071 fixed. It seems that is missing from > your second approach. Let me sleep on it. What are the chances of you > agreeing on doing the +really upstream version dance such that we can > get some testing done in unstable? Hmm, I forgot I hinted at a follow up from me while I was waiting for a response from you. Let's get this thing moving. We are running out of time (I do want to have some time where the package is actually used before the release). I still prefer a version via unstable that I can approve from there, but if this is too difficult because of version mangling (hinted in private), than please upload to tpu. You asked my preference for two versions by you, I suggest to go with the version based on the highest one that has been in unstable already. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature