On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 09:54:50PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 05-06-2019 22:28, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I really want bug 900912 and 925071 fixed. It seems that is missing from > > your second approach. Let me sleep on it. What are the chances of you > > agreeing on doing the +really upstream version dance such that we can > > get some testing done in unstable? > > Hmm, I forgot I hinted at a follow up from me while I was waiting for a > response from you. > > Let's get this thing moving. We are running out of time (I do want to > have some time where the package is actually used before the release). I > still prefer a version via unstable that I can approve from there, but > if this is too difficult because of version mangling (hinted in > private), than please upload to tpu. You asked my preference for two > versions by you, I suggest to go with the version based on the highest > one that has been in unstable already. Hi Paul, I thought perhaps there was a side conversation going on, so thank you for resuming the thread. Of the two debdiffs I included before, neither was based on the current version in unstable, 11.0.4+4-1. I will start with that package and patch upstream back to 11.0.3+7. For an upload to unstable the version will be: 11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7-1 which will also roll unstable back to the upstream GA release. More soon - thank you, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature