On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2019-09-02 14:09, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > I'm slightly confused though: unstable has 18.11.2-2, and p-u has a > > +deb10u1 changelog-only rebuild of that - is this not the right > > procedure? What is missing from unstable/testing? > > Ah, I see. In which case, the lack of fixes isn't an issue, but the > version is instead. > > 18.11.2-2+deb10u1 is a higher version than 18.11.2-2 - a changelog- > only > rebuild should be *~*deb10u1 so as to sort lower, in the same way as > ~bpo is used for uploads to -backports. > > Packages in stable should not have higher version numbers than > testing > or unstable, so we will still need to ask ftp-master to push the > package > from p-u into those suites as part of the point release, in order not > to > violate that constraint. > > Apologies for the confusion and for not having checked more > carefully > before accepting the package in order to have avoided the issue. > > Regards, > > Adam Agh sorry, my bad! Would it make your life easier if I uploaded a new revision to unstable? There's a few small cosmetic cleanups I can do, like bumping standards-version and such. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part