On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 14:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2019-08-21 12:48, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 23:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > > > This request never made it to debian-release, most likely due to > > > the > > > size of the diff. > > > > Sorry, didn't notice that! > > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > We would like to upload a new LTS release version of DPDK to > > > > buster. > > > > We have already done this previously in stretch, and it was > > > > approved > > > > for the 16.11 LTS series [1][2][3], but given this is a new > > > > Debian > > > > release in combination with a new LTS release train I have not > > > > yet > > > > uploaded to p-u and will wait for an explicit ACK. We would > > > > like to > > > > upload new 18.11 LTS versions as they are released upstream to > > > > buster > > > > - > > > > EOL is projected in November 2020. > > > > > > What's the plan for after that point? > > > > Same as for stretch and 16.11 LTS - if there are critical and/or > > security related bugs that affect the branch, we will do our best > > to > > backport the fixes as downstream maintainers. > > This is partly my fault for assuming what you'd done, rather than > checking, but it appears that the fixes included in this upload are > not > currently in unstable, which is one of the basic requirements for > updates via p-u. Further, p-u now has a higher version number than > the > package in unstable. > > As it stands currently, our choices for Saturday's point release are > either deciding to skip the dpdk update until 10.2, or asking ftp- > master > to push the package from p-u to unstable (and testing) during the > point > release. > > Regards, > > Adam Hello Adam, First of all, sorry for any troubles caused and thanks for checking. I'm slightly confused though: unstable has 18.11.2-2, and p-u has a +deb10u1 changelog-only rebuild of that - is this not the right procedure? What is missing from unstable/testing? -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part