Bug#918308: transition: botan
On 13/01/2019 18:52, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:08 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 04/01/2019 23:08, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>>> It's a small transition with only three packages: biboumi,
>>> libqtshadowsocks and qtcreator. All three build fine with
>>> this botan release as well.
>>
>> Go ahead.
> Uploaded and even migrated to Buster, but just realized that I don't
> see the binNMUs.
Oh, I missed those.
> Meanwhile botan 2.9.0 was released[1], packaged and uploaded to
> experimental as it contains a soname change again and fixes a security
> issue. Also contain many other fixes to prevent side channel attacks.
> Of course, the dependencies still build fine with this release as
> well.
> Is it allowed to further update an ongoing transition?
Normally that would be a different transition but since I haven't scheduled the
binNMUs and due to the security fixes and to the good package state, let's go
ahead with 2.9.0.
Emilio
Reply to: