Bug#919022: marked as done (is it a transition if the only rdep is already broken: libgpuarray)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:50:36 +0100
with message-id <42e0b8e6-75fb-23cb-b001-39cd6b75c565@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#919022: is it a transition if the only rdep is already broken: libgpuarray
has caused the Debian Bug report #919022,
regarding is it a transition if the only rdep is already broken: libgpuarray
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
919022: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919022
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I have just been given permission to take over libgpuarray.
I would like to update it from 0.6.9 to 0.7.6, which bumps SONAME from 2
to 3 and is described by upstream as including API changes [0].
The only other Debian package that (optionally) uses libgpuarray is
theano. This part of theano *only* works with the *new* libgpuarray,
i.e. is currently broken [1].
libgpuarray is currently not in testing because it is RC buggy, but that
can and will be fixed with or without going to the new upstream version.
I can prepare this tonight, but not necessarily upload it as I am only a
DM and don't have rights for this package.
theano uses the Python interface to libgpuarray, so it will not need to
be binNMUd and there is no real point in having a formal transition tracker.
[0] https://github.com/Theano/libgpuarray/releases
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901487
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11/01/2019 21:28, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> I have just been given permission to take over libgpuarray.
>
> I would like to update it from 0.6.9 to 0.7.6, which bumps SONAME from 2 to 3
> and is described by upstream as including API changes [0].
>
> The only other Debian package that (optionally) uses libgpuarray is theano.
> This part of theano *only* works with the *new* libgpuarray, i.e. is currently
> broken [1].
>
> libgpuarray is currently not in testing because it is RC buggy, but that can and
> will be fixed with or without going to the new upstream version.
>
> I can prepare this tonight, but not necessarily upload it as I am only a DM and
> don't have rights for this package.
>
> theano uses the Python interface to libgpuarray, so it will not need to be
> binNMUd and there is no real point in having a formal transition tracker.
With no rdeps and not being in testing, there's nothing for us to do here. Just
go ahead as there's no effective transition.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: