Bug#918308: transition: botan

[László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>]

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 7:53 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> On 13/01/2019 18:52, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > Meanwhile botan 2.9.0 was released[1], packaged and uploaded to
> > experimental as it contains a soname change again and fixes a security
> > issue. Also contain many other fixes to prevent side channel attacks.
> > Of course, the dependencies still build fine with this release as
> > well.
> > Is it allowed to further update an ongoing transition?
>
> Normally that would be a different transition but since I haven't scheduled the
> binNMUs and due to the security fixes and to the good package state, let's go
> ahead with 2.9.0.
 Uploaded 2.9.0 to Sid and it was built on all release architectures.
You can schedule the binNMUs.

Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS