Bug#907199: weboob, Gratuitous sexual references

[Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>]

Hi Ian,

> If you advise that it would be better for me to try a direct contact
> with upstream then I am happy to do so.  In which case I would
> appreciate a (private) review from someone of my proposed messages.

Sure thing; if I could help with any of that please get in touch.

> I would be interested to hear from you, how I should ask questions
> like:
> 
>   "does the DPL think there are other useful avenues that we should
>   try, before a GR"
> 
> or
> 
>   "how would the release team view a GR with an advisory text"

I totally understand and appreciate the rationale of outlining the
potential options in a roadmap — it is indeed an effective approach in
most areas in order to frame where one is in a process.

Howver I suspect and worry that this is a special-case is in that
simply mentioning the General Resolution hammer in such questions (when
it has not definitively, quote-regrettably-unquote, and 100% reached
that point yet) can easily be interpreted as unnecessarily truculent,
however strictly true it is.

Apologies if this possible "exception" angle was not clearer in my
previous mails to you.

> I didn't receive any reply.  I also note that you yourself didn't
> forward my message to AH as far as I can see.

I did not see this mail but I don't think I would have forwarded it
to AH myself, so thank-you for doing so. From their reply, it seems
like there is to be some activity there first to P()-upon, semaphore-
wise.


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-