[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#819530: marked as done (transition: icu)



Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:23:09 +0100
with message-id <59a54cdc-82f1-a84c-69a5-0e81e548ebbb@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#819530: transition: icu
has caused the Debian Bug report #819530,
regarding transition: icu
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
819530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819530
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

ICU has a new major upstream release, supporting several new things
that I would like to see in Stretch:
- CLDR[1] 28 [2] and 29 [3] support,
- Unicode 8.0.0 [4] support.

As it affects the system from Boost C++ libraries (several packages
build depends on it) to LibreOffice, it's not uploaded to experimental
even. But my local build tests on amd64 shows that Boost 1.58 could be
built and transiently some packages that build depends on Boost.
The biggest one is LibreOffice which could be built of course. In
short, I compiled ICU 57.1 and installed it -> compiled and installed
Boost 1.58 -> successfully compiled LibreOffice 5.1.2~RC1.
May I proceed with the upload, targeting experimental first?

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://cldr.unicode.org/index
[2] http://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-28
[3] http://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-29
[4] http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode8.0.0/#Summary

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 05/11/16 00:00, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
> On 04/11/16 23:51, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 10:24:52PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> And this is finally finished.
>>
>> Umh, though there is still the old version libicu55 on s390x, due to
>> xerces-c - #833754
> 
> Oh, I knew about that, but thought it had been fixed because the tracker
> disappeared from 'pending transitions'. Now I realise that was because there is
> a new one in 'planned transitions' because of the new package in experimental,
> which causes the other one to disappear.
> 
> Let's reopen this.

xerces-c got finally fixed. Let's close this.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: