[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#807867: marked as done (nmu: all packages built without GCC 5 and hardening-wrapper)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:33:23 +0300
with message-id <20161025213323.bdyijn446mqjkb6n@bunk.spdns.de>
and subject line hardening-wrapper has been removed from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #807867,
regarding nmu: all packages built without GCC 5 and hardening-wrapper
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
807867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807867
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: hardening-wrapper
Version: 2.7
Severity: important

It appears that the behavior of hardening-wrapper has changed recently, and
now PIE and stack protection are missing.  mumble got a binNMU for the GCC-5
upgrade relating to library transitions for protobuf and zeroc-ice after which
these protections were missing where they had them before the binNMU.

Looking at the snapshot:
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141110T040546Z/pool/main/m/mumble/mumble_1.2.8-2_amd64.deb
mumble_1.2.8-2_amd64 hardening check:
    Position Independent Executable: yes
    Stack protected: yes
    Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found)
    Read-only relocations: yes
    Immediate binding: yes

Looking at Sid:
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mumble/mumble_1.2.8-2+b1_amd64.deb
mumble_1.2.8-2+b1_amd64 hardening check:
    Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable!
    Stack protected: no, not found!
    Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found)
    Read-only relocations: yes
    Immediate binding: yes

Reporting this as these are unexpected differences.


Also: is hardening-wrapper being deprecated?  I ask because lintian is
reporting it as such.  (See #711193)

Thanks.
   -- Chris

Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@coredump.us



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
hardening-wrapper has been removed from unstable earlier this month.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--- End Message ---
Reply to: