Bug#839242: jessie-pu: package linkchecker/9.3-1

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On 2016-10-03 15:01, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-10-03 09:49:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > No, I meant "jessie" - please presume I might know what I'm doing 
> > here.
> > :-) "stable" will work, but the codename is preferred, as it is more
> > self-documenting.
>
> Ouch, ok. :/ Sorry about that - previous p-u I made were made with the
> "stable" codename, so I assumed I was correct.

It's a correct choice. It's just not the one we prefer. :-)

[devref]
> > (Nevertheless, it does correctly
> > document ${codename}-security for uploads to the security archive, so 
> > it
> > would be useful to be explicit for stable as well.)
>
> Understood.
>
> Is there anything I should be doing now short of fixing the fine
> documentation? :)

Nope, you're all done :)

Regards,

Adam