Bug#839242: jessie-pu: package linkchecker/9.3-1
On 2016-10-03 09:49:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> [p-u bugs get closed when the package is in stable, not as part of the
> upload]
Ack, I was wondering too.
> On 2016-10-03 14:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2016-10-02 18:05:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...
>>> Thanks. With the changelog distribution changed to "jessie", please go
>>> ahead.
>>
>> I assume you meant "stable", as documented in the developer's reference
>> and that I have used before.
>
> No, I meant "jessie" - please presume I might know what I'm doing here.
> :-) "stable" will work, but the codename is preferred, as it is more
> self-documenting.
Ouch, ok. :/ Sorry about that - previous p-u I made were made with the
"stable" codename, so I assumed I was correct.
> DevRef is not an authorative source, particularly over the request of
> the person wearing the relevant hat.
I understand. I assumed you simply were implying "stable" and not
meaning litterally "jessie".
> (Nevertheless, it does correctly
> document ${codename}-security for uploads to the security archive, so it
> would be useful to be explicit for stable as well.)
Understood.
Is there anything I should be doing now short of fixing the fine
documentation? :)
Thanks again for the hand holding and sorry for the trouble.
A.
--
A lot of people never use their initiative because no-one told them to.
- Bansky
Reply to: