Re: Kurt Roeckx 2016-09-16 <[🔎] 20160916054549.2wjl4xzb2eyg6v5q@roeckx.be> > > do you expect the transition to be done for stretch? > > I really would like to have it in stretch. I don't want to have > the same situtation like we had with 1.0.2 that didn't make it it > to jessie. Nod, thanks for confirming. > > I'm asking because the PostgreSQL people want to know if they need to > > add support for OpenSSL 1.1 in the older release branches (9.2 .. > > 9.4), or if patching 9.5 .. 10 is enough for now. > > I guess they want to provide binaries for all their releases on > apt.postgresql.org? That's exactly the reason, yes. (And "they" is me ;) Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature