Bug#827061: transition: openssl
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:44:42PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Kurt Roeckx 2016-06-11 <20160611194259.GA6864@roeckx.be>
> > > > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> > > > transition? Are there things you want me to do?
> > >
> > > Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.
> >
> > It's in experimental already. The test suite only fails
> > on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine. I still
> > need to look at that.
>
> Hi,
>
> do you expect the transition to be done for stretch?
I really would like to have it in stretch. I don't want to have
the same situtation like we had with 1.0.2 that didn't make it it
to jessie.
> I'm asking because the PostgreSQL people want to know if they need to
> add support for OpenSSL 1.1 in the older release branches (9.2 ..
> 9.4), or if patching 9.5 .. 10 is enough for now.
I guess they want to provide binaries for all their releases on
apt.postgresql.org?
> (Alternatively, would stretch have OpenSSL 1.0 next to 1.1? This seems
> unlikely, but just to confirm?)
This is not my plan.
Kurt
Reply to: