Bug#824591: marked as done (transition: evolution-data-server 3.20)
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 00:53:38 +0200
with message-id <57477E72.3000803@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #824591,
regarding transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
824591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
with the libical transition [1] finished, we'd like to proceed with
evolution-data-server 3.20. The auto-tracker at 3.20 looks fine.
We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only
syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the
works.
Please let us know when we can upload e-d-s 3.20 to unstable.
Regards,
Michael
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/797074
[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 21/05/16 11:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/05/16 20:21, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 18.05.2016 um 16:45 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On 18/05/16 15:14, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>> Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>>>> We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only
>>>>> syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the
>>>>> works.
>>>>
>>>> Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical
>>>> (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable.
>>>>
>>>> Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is
>>>> evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has
>>>> been built everywhere successfully.
>>>> So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition.
>>
>> evolution-data-server was uploaded in the mean time.
>> I also made sourceful uploads of evolution, evolution-ews and evolution-rss.
>>
>> Due to some unfortunate timing, evolution-rss on armel did pick up a
>> dependency on evolution 3.18.
>>
>> Emilio, could you please schedule a binNMU for evolution-rss on armel
>> with a dw on evolution-dev (>= 3.20).
>
> Scheduled.
This has just migrated a few hours ago.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: