Bug#824591: transition: evolution-data-server 3.20
On 20/05/16 20:21, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 18.05.2016 um 16:45 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 18/05/16 15:14, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>>> We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only
>>>> syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the
>>>> works.
>>>
>>> Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical
>>> (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable.
>>>
>>> Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is
>>> evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has
>>> been built everywhere successfully.
>>> So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition.
>
> evolution-data-server was uploaded in the mean time.
> I also made sourceful uploads of evolution, evolution-ews and evolution-rss.
>
> Due to some unfortunate timing, evolution-rss on armel did pick up a
> dependency on evolution 3.18.
>
> Emilio, could you please schedule a binNMU for evolution-rss on armel
> with a dw on evolution-dev (>= 3.20).
Scheduled.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: