Bug#815613: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb7u2
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 20:53 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-02-24 19:42:57 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2016-02-22 22:42:47 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > Please go ahead.
> > >
> > > Thanks, done.
> >
> > clamav itself has now built everywhere - yay - but we still need to deal
> > with the FTBFS of c-icap-modules (which doesn't appear to be clamav's
> > fault, but is blocking this being complete).
>
> The last time we looked, the pointers were:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768684
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/c-icap.git/plain/debian/patches/0010-Rename-CONF-to-C_ICAP_CONF.patch?h=debian/1%250.3.4-2&id=17cc5a80958526a495392653e944ad6aad8ff883
Thanks.
> Scott, wanted to look at this but I don't know about his timming /
> workload atm. However, we want to complete this :)
> How would you like to see this done (assuming the patch in question
> fixes the issue)? Should we just prepare a +deb7u1 c-icap package and
> open a p-u bug (which kind of looks like NMU) or should we involve the
> current maintainer of this package?
It's not that unusual for a stable update to be performed by someone
other than the maintainer. I don't think I particularly know the c-icap
maintainer, but as a compromise maybe open the bug with an X-Debbugs-CC
to them saying you're happy to handle it?
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: