[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#815613: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb7u2



On 2016-02-24 19:42:57 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 09:45 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2016-02-22 22:42:47 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Please go ahead.
> > 
> > Thanks, done.
> 
> clamav itself has now built everywhere - yay - but we still need to deal
> with the FTBFS of c-icap-modules (which doesn't appear to be clamav's
> fault, but is blocking this being complete).

The last time we looked, the pointers were:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768684
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/c-icap.git/plain/debian/patches/0010-Rename-CONF-to-C_ICAP_CONF.patch?h=debian/1%250.3.4-2&id=17cc5a80958526a495392653e944ad6aad8ff883

Scott, wanted to look at this but I don't know about his timming /
workload atm. However, we want to complete this :)
How would you like to see this done (assuming the patch in question
fixes the issue)? Should we just prepare a +deb7u1 c-icap package and
open a p-u bug (which kind of looks like NMU) or should we involve the
current maintainer of this package?

> [I'm also pondering whether we should re-binNMU things just on the
> off-chance that the updated patch makes any difference to anything]

I doubt the patch makes any difference for the packages linked against
libclamav7.

> Regards,
> 
> Adam

Sebastian


Reply to: