Bug#650601: libpng is ready for transtion
This time with d-boot in CC...
Forwarding to debian-boot, as requested from Cyril.
Debian-Boot people, please take a look at #650601 -- the libpng16
transition which is now ready to be started. There are a few udebs
affected, which is tested as described below (following a request from
Cyril).
IMHO also the udeb part is ready for the transition, but I'm not in the
d-i topics.
--
tobi
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:05:22 +0100 Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>
wrote:
> Hallo KiBi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:51:11 +0100 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tested a debian installer build where some packages were
> > built against libpng12-0-udeb and some other against libpng16-16-
> udeb?
> > Does that work? Or are we looking at a giant transition where
> everything
> > must switch to libpng16 at once?
> > Â
> > Mraw,
> > KiBi.
>
> As requested, I performed those build of the d-i, version 20160106:Â
>
> Testmatrix
>
> A libcairo2-udeb_1.14.6-1.1~libpng16_amd64.udeb
> B libdirectfb-1.2-9-udeb_1.2.10.0-5.2~libpng16_amd64.udebÂ
> C libfreetype6-udeb_2.6.1-0.2~libpng16_amd64.udeb
> D libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-udeb_2.32.3-1.1~libpng16_amd64.udeb
> E libpng16-16-udeb_1.6.20-1.2~libpng16+patched+1_amd64.udeb
> F matchbox-keyboard-udeb_0.1+svn20080916-10.1~libpng16_amd64.udeb
>
> Two more udeb packages where generated during the mass rebuild on my
> server, bu removed from test-matrix, as they do not Depend: on
libpng:
> libslang2, libdirectfb-bin
>
> Key x -> libpng16-version used
> Â Â Â Â . -> standard version used
>
>    A B C D E F   result   (comment)
> 1  . . . . . .   builds   "control group"
> 2  x . x . x .   builds    Â
> 3  . x x . x .   builds
> 4  . . . x x .   builds
> 5  . x . x x x   builds  Â
> 6  x x x x x x  builds  "target version"Â
>
>
> Procedure:
> - debuld in debian-installer directory.
> - examination of created debian-installer-images tarball, especially
> the MANIFEST.udebs file for installed udebs (if matches expectations,
> if both libpngs are present
>
>
> Let me know if you want to see other combinations tested too (and
> which)
>
> Thanks
> --Â
> tobi
>
>
Reply to: