Hello Jonathan, On 28/11/2014 20:28, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote: >> I've been working for some days to solve several bugs on this package >> with Helmut Grohne and Wouter Verhelst help. >> >> I tried, and succeeded, to solve following bugs: >> >> #767676: ola-rdm-tests: fails to install: subprocess installed >> post-installation script returned error exit status 10 >> #755866: ola: FTBFS: tests fail >> #769331: ola: unowned directory after purge: /etc/ola/ >> #769670: ola-rdm-tests: FTBFS in a sid chroot with pbuilder (no network) >> #760414: [ola] Some sources are not included in your package >> >> Right now, Wouter, who is the package maintainer, disagree on #760414 >> severity, thus blocking fixed package upload. >> >> Since I haven't heard about him for a week, and given the fact that >> deadline is approching, I kindly request your decision on that point: >> Should #760414 be considered as serious, and thus fixed in my NMU, or not ? > > Given that the maintainer disagrees on the severity and with FTP masters, I > don't think that bug should be part of an NMU regardless of severity. NMUs > are not a good way to resolve disputes. > > Therefore, feel free to go ahead with an NMU that does not include the > disputed bug, and remove the moreinfo tag when it's in sid. I don't have any dispute with anyone, but after reading bug report, it seemed there was a disagreement I just wanted to clarify :) Anyway, my NMU has been uploaded by Helmut and reached sid today. I just removed the moreinfo tag has requested. Thanks, Jean Baptiste
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature