On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:53:54 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:45:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 22:29:10 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > Hi release team, > > > dpkg-buildflags was switched to the strong stack protector on > > > the 10th of August. Many security-sensitive packages have already > > > been uploaded to unstable since then and I'm tracking which are > > > missing. > > > > > > For the remaining ones I'd like to request binNMUs. Is that > > > ok with and when's the best time? Probably not to early before > > > the freeze since some maintainer uploads will follow anyway, > > > but also not to close to the freeze. Maybe mid-October? > > > > > I think if you have a list now, that would be fine. We can always give > > them low build priority to not monopolize the buildds. > > Ok, will send the latest list in a few days. Is a list of source > packages enough or do you need to current version in unstable as well? > A version would allow us to not do unnecessary rebuilds if there's been a new upload after you generated the list. But if it's painful for you to generate, it's not actually mandatory. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature