On 27-05-14 15:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Aside from > lazarus itself, doing so would break optgeo, which has a > build-dependency on lazarus-ide-1.2. Is there any reason why this isn't shown in the excuses on the packages.qa page? Usually these kind of dependencies are shown, aren't they? Anyways, I just filed a bug 749539 against optgeo because it now FTBFS. On 26-05-14 23:10, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > We should probably remove any and replace with explicit supported arch > list. No, I don't agree. In principle Lazarus can run on any platform (that fpc can compile it on). So no need for explicit mentioning supported platforms. Also fpc just won't get build as long as it is not bootstrapped on a platform, but if it get bootstrapped, it is obviously supported on that platform. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature