[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lazarus not migrating, why?



On 2014-05-27 13:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2014-05-27 13:12, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
The Britney output is odd because it seems to implicate those specific
architectures where the arch:all packages were uninstallable anyway;
but the rename affects *all* arches...

The britney output is only as "odd" as the actual state of the
archive... it lists the architectures where dak is still inserting the
arch:all packages in to the Packages files; for the architectures
where the new version of lazarus was built, dak is only including the
newer packages, as expected.

I've queried on IRC why the older packages are still being included on
the other architectures, but not had a response yet.

After a quick discussion, it appears that the old arch:all packages are still around because lazarus needs decrufting on sparc. Aside from lazarus itself, doing so would break optgeo, which has a build-dependency on lazarus-ide-1.2.

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: