[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704849: t-p-u: tucnak2/2.47-2+deb7u1



Control: tag -1 confirmed

On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:53:33PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 2013-04-06 21:04, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Why the change from a case to an if test?
> 
> alternatives should be left untouched in prerm deconfigure (see #71621)
> (that also matches the incomplete fix applied by the maintainer in 2.48-1)
> 
> With only one case left, an if is easier and I don't have to check
> whether 'case ... *)\nesac' is actually valid syntax ... (without
> another ;; before the esac)

Ok. The maintainers haven't reacted to your debdiff, so please go ahead
when convenient.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: