[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704849: t-p-u: tucnak2/2.47-2+deb7u1



Hi Jonathan,

On 2013-04-06 21:04, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Why the change from a case to an if test?

alternatives should be left untouched in prerm deconfigure (see #71621)
(that also matches the incomplete fix applied by the maintainer in 2.48-1)

With only one case left, an if is easier and I don't have to check
whether 'case ... *)\nesac' is actually valid syntax ... (without
another ;; before the esac)

Andreas


Reply to: