On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:36:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Additionally, it marks the package as MA: foreign. SVN also had two > > old commits that add a missing pre-dependency on dpkg, and remove > > redundant dirs from debian/alsa-base.dirs. If these two old commits > > are unacceptable, I'll revert and rebuild, but I've checked that the > > package contents are identical. > > As I understand it, the release team really likes to see only the > important changes, i.e. I suggest you only fix the conffile issue. Right. I'll wait for rt to say what they think, specially for the MA and the pre-dependency. > By the way, what happens if people changed both the old and new file? > They get the old one, wouldn't you say that the new one is better in > that case (and maybe leave the old one as well)? Unless bug, testing users who have both files and both are modified will just get the new one, and the old one will stay in the directory until the package is purged. rJodi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jordi@sindominio.net jordi@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature