(disclaimer: I am not part of the release team). On 05-04-13 06:50, Jordi Mallach wrote: > Additionally, it marks the package as MA: foreign. SVN also had two > old commits that add a missing pre-dependency on dpkg, and remove > redundant dirs from debian/alsa-base.dirs. If these two old commits > are unacceptable, I'll revert and rebuild, but I've checked that the > package contents are identical. As I understand it, the release team really likes to see only the important changes, i.e. I suggest you only fix the conffile issue. By the way, what happens if people changed both the old and new file? They get the old one, wouldn't you say that the new one is better in that case (and maybe leave the old one as well)? Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature